裁判有多糊塗？漏判了罰球還懵然不知

今季NBA有不少判決經常都惹來極大的爭議，使裁判的專業和權威都備受質疑。要討論一個判決是否合理，這會是爭論不休的話題，因為不同裁判的執法尺度都可能會有差異。但有時連場上一些最基本的事都察覺不到，實在不得不讓人質疑裁判的專業。在今日鷹隊對紐約人的賽事中，裁判差點就判漏了一個罰球給鷹隊。

在第四節3:49，Kent Bazemore在三分線起手搏得三個罰球，當Bazemore第二個罰球射失後，Doug McDermott便去衝搶籃板，大家都忘記了Bazemore還有第三個罰球未射。直到Tim Hardaway Jr.在籃下雙手灌籃搏得and1後，才發現還欠Bazemore一個罰球，最終裁判決定判Hardaway的入球無效，比賽時間調到原先出錯3:49，讓Bazemore射第三個罰球，比賽才繼續。
Bazemore重獲第三個罰球:


Hardaway這球被判無效

賽後，裁判解釋指由於他們漏判了第三個罰球，而當時在漏判後24秒內，按照球例比賽時間會回到出錯時候，所以Hardaway入球會被判無效。他指如果在漏判後24秒以外才發現，Hardaway的入球會被判有效。

引用Q: Why did the play continue after Bazemore’s second free throw and why did Hardaway’s basket not count?

A: What was called was a 3-shot foul and not 2. So, played continued erroneously after two free throws, now we go down to the other end of the floor and we have a foul. Then it was brought to our attention that we should’ve shot one extra free throw. The rule under correctable errors is, do you want the citation? It says if there’s a merited free throw that was not shot, that was to remain in play, which was what our situation was, than if under 24 seconds have elapsed, we go back to the point of interruption, reset the game clock, and nullify all play that happens up until that point.

Q: What would happen if it happened after 25 seconds?

A: That play would count, the foul would count. We’d still go back and we’d correct the error but since it was over 24 seconds, we would play from where the foul happened. Since it was under 24, we nullify all play and we go back to the point of interruption.

Q: Where is it found in the rulebook?

A: Rule 2, section 6, Af.